Correspondence
An error in the comparison deserves a correction as clearly stated as the original result.
Correspondence
There is no public email address or message form for GLP-1 King at present. This page does not receive submissions. No reply can be offered through it, and treatment advice falls outside this site’s purpose.
The about page describes the editorial purpose of the site. The study list collects the sources used in its arguments.
A disputed comparison
A useful correction starts with the page and the exact sentence in dispute. The next question is where the error lies: the population, the opponent, the measured outcome, the interval, or the description of the result. The paper’s title and the relevant passage make the disagreement much easier to resolve.
I’d regard a mistaken trial population as every bit as consequential as a mistyped percentage. The argument here depends on knowing which contest a result actually describes.